Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
Price: 846 EUR – 1.556 EUR
Price history
Availability: 6/10 (Common)
Gibson's no-frills Les Paul, as built in Nashville between the 1990 redesign and the 1997 model year: mahogany body with a plain, unbound maple cap, an ebony fingerboard that the pricier Les Paul Standard did not get, and the then-new 490R/498T humbucker pair. A working guitar rather than a showpiece - and, at around 4 to 4.5 kg, an honestly heavy one.
About the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
The Les Paul Studio was conceived in 1983 as the model that keeps the Les Paul recipe and drops the decoration: no body binding, no neck binding, no pearl crown on the headstock, and a body cut roughly an eighth to a quarter of an inch shallower than a full Les Paul. What it kept is the load-bearing part - mahogany back, carved maple cap, glued-in mahogany neck, 24.75-inch scale, Tune-o-matic bridge with a separate stopbar.
The 1990 to 1997 guitars are a distinct generation inside that story, because Gibson redesigned the Studio from the ground up in 1990 and then left it alone until 1998. Three things define the window. The fingerboard is ebony, not rosewood - which is the odd and pleasant detail here, since the considerably more expensive Les Paul Standard of the same years used rosewood and ebony was otherwise a Les Paul Custom feature. The inlays became pearloid trapezoids, the same shape as on the upmarket models, replacing the plain dots of earlier Studios. And the pickups became Gibson's then-brand-new 49x humbuckers: a 490R with an Alnico II magnet in the neck and a hotter, Alnico V 498T in the bridge, the pair that would go on to define Gibson USA's sound for two decades. Baseplates from this era typically carry a PAF decal, which is cosmetic rather than a claim about the winding.
One widespread misconception is worth clearing up: these Studios are not all-mahogany. Dealer documentation from the period consistently describes a mahogany back - often a single piece - with a carved maple top glued up from two or three pieces, and translucent finishes such as the 1991 trans wine red exist precisely because there is maple under the lacquer. What the Studio's cap lacks is figure and binding, so Gibson could use plain stock and finish most of the run opaque in Ebony, Wine Red or Alpine White. The genuinely cap-free Studio derivatives came later or alongside: the P-90-loaded Gem series of 1996 to 1998, and the Vintage Mahogany models of the 2000s.
Construction follows Gibson USA practice of the day rather than reissue practice. The neck is set with the short tenon used across the regular production line; the long tenon was reserved for the Historic Collection reissues that started in 1993. The headstock is pitched at the steeper 17 degrees Gibson had returned to, with no Norlin-style volute behind the nut. Hardware came in chrome or gold depending on the order, with a Nashville Tune-o-matic, and vintage-style Gibson Deluxe tuners with green plastic tulip buttons. Guitars from 1994 are worth a second look at the serial number: Gibson's centennial year broke the usual eight-digit day-of-year code and many instruments simply begin with 94 followed by a six-digit sequence.
Where to buy
-
Reverb 846 EUR Best price View details
-
Reverb 1.022 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.250 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.299 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.360 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.390 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.390 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.390 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.399 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.425 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.446 EUR View details
-
Reverb 1.556 EUR View details
No platform selected – pick at least one above.
Some links below are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Source: https://reverb.com/item/100896844-gibson-les-paul-studio-thin-body-1995-ebony
Sound character of the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
The voice is the classic mahogany-and-maple Les Paul picture with a slightly harder edge. The 490R in the neck, on an Alnico II magnet, stays close to a vintage humbucker with a touch more upper-midrange presence - warm and throaty rather than muddy. The 498T in the bridge uses an Alnico V magnet and more turns of wire, so it reads bright and cutting on a clean amp and turns to midrange snarl with real sustain once the amp is pushed. Because the body is solid with no weight relief and the cap is plain maple over a thick mahogany back, the response is dense and mid-forward rather than airy, and the ebony fingerboard sharpens the attack a little compared with rosewood. Dealer descriptions of period examples consistently note how loud they are unplugged, with bold mids and clear top end.
What owners of the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997 say
This is a workhorse guitar through and through. The fit and finish on early- to mid-1990s Studios sits close to the pricier models, and the feel arguably holds up better than on later Studios - which is why this era has quietly become a value tip on the used market rather than a bargain-bin pick.
The ebony fingerboard is a constant point of satisfaction - a budget model carrying the same board material as the Custom, a spec Gibson dropped again in 1998. Weight is the standing trade-off: it comes with the territory, and long sets can mean real shoulder strain, so the Studio Lite is worth a look if that matters more than tone. Body depth is less clear-cut - some examples feel no different from a Standard or Custom, others noticeably thinner - most likely because the specification varied from year to year within this run. One thing worth treating with caution: claims of fully mahogany, cap-free bodies on 1990/91 examples trace back to guitars under opaque paint and haven't been confirmed.
Playability & handling of the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
Weight is the first thing anyone notices, and it is not a myth. Documented examples from this era land between roughly 4.0 and 4.5 kg (about 8.8 to 10 lb), with most sitting around 4.1 to 4.4 kg - a 1990 in wine red at 4.0 kg, a 1992 in Alpine White at 4.1 kg, a 1991 at 4.3 kg. There is no weight relief in the standard Studio of these years; the body is solid, which is exactly why Gibson sold the balsa-cored Studio Lite alongside it from 1990. For a long set this is a shoulder matter, and a wide padded strap is not a luxury.
The neck is a medium rounded C, neither the slim 1960s profile nor a 1950s baseball bat. A measured 1992 example runs about 21 mm deep at the first fret and 25 mm at the twelfth, on a nut width of roughly 43 mm and a 305 mm (12-inch) radius. Descriptions of individual guitars range from slim-to-medium to distinctly full, so the profile is worth checking on the specific instrument rather than assuming.
The 24.75-inch scale means noticeably less string tension than a 25.5-inch instrument at the same gauge, so bends and vibrato take less effort - part of why Les Pauls feel forgiving to the fretting hand despite the heft. The ebony fingerboard adds a slightly harder, more immediate attack than rosewood and a very smooth surface under the fingers. Operation is as simple as electric guitars get: nothing to switch beyond the toggle and two pairs of knobs, no battery, no active circuit.
Recommended accessories & strings for the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
On a 24.75-inch scale, a .010-.046 set is the usual starting point and the gauge Gibson itself has long shipped; because the shorter scale lowers tension, players who find .010s too slack often go to .011s rather than heavier on a longer-scale guitar. A wide, well-padded strap matters more here than on most electrics given the 4 to 4.5 kg body.
The 490R/498T pairing suits the amplifier families you would expect from a Les Paul: EL34-based British-style heads reward the 498T's upper-midrange bite, while smaller EL84 or tweed-style combos let the 490R neck pickup do its warm, vocal thing. A simple overdrive in front is usually enough; these pickups are hot enough that a lot of gain is rarely needed.
One maintenance item is specific to guitars of this vintage and worth budgeting for. The green plastic tulip buttons on the vintage-style Gibson Deluxe tuners decompose chemically over decades: they shrink, darken, go crystalline and flaky, and can crumble in your fingers while you tune. The standard fixes are replacement buttons or a complete set of tuners; the old buttons are usually removed by warming the shaft carefully so the plastic releases. Beyond that, the Nashville Tune-o-matic takes replacement saddles easily, and a brown Gibson hardshell case with pink lining was the period-correct case for these guitars.
Technical data for the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
| Type | Solid-body electric guitar, single cutaway, glued-in (set) neck |
|---|---|
| Production run | 1990-1997, Gibson USA, Nashville, Tennessee |
| Body | Mahogany back, frequently one piece, with a carved plain maple cap usually glued up from two or three pieces; no binding |
| Body depth | Cut roughly 1/8 to 1/4 in. shallower than a full Les Paul as part of the original Studio concept; owners of 1990s examples commonly report about 1/8 in., and reports vary by year |
| Weight relief | None on the standard Studio of this period; the balsa-cored Studio Lite (1990-1998) was the weight-relieved alternative |
| Neck | Mahogany, glued in with the short tenon used across Gibson USA production of the era (the long tenon was reserved for the Historic Collection reissues from 1993) |
| Neck profile | Medium rounded C; a measured 1992 example is approx. 21 mm deep at the 1st fret and 25 mm at the 12th |
| Fingerboard | Ebony - standard on essentially all Studios in this window, while the more expensive Les Paul Standard of the same years used rosewood |
| Inlays | Pearloid trapezoids from the 1990 redesign onward; plain Gibson logo on the headstock with no crown or diamond inlay |
| Frets / radius / scale | 22 frets, 12 in. (305 mm) radius, 24.75 in. (628 mm) scale |
| Nut width | Approx. 43 mm (1-11/16 in.) |
| Headstock pitch | 17 degrees, with no volute behind the nut |
| Pickups | Gibson 490R (Alnico II) at the neck and 498T (Alnico V, hotter wind) at the bridge, introduced with Gibson's 49x series in 1990; baseplates typically carry a PAF decal. Some 1990 examples still left the factory with the earlier 'The Original' HB-R/HB-L humbuckers |
| Controls | Two volume and two tone controls, one pair per pickup, plus a three-way pickup toggle; passive throughout, no coil split, no battery |
| Bridge / tailpiece | Nashville Tune-o-matic bridge with a separate stopbar tailpiece |
| Tuners | Vintage-style Gibson Deluxe with green plastic tulip buttons |
| Hardware finish | Chrome or gold depending on the specification; early-1990s examples are documented with black speed knobs |
| Finishes | Ebony, Wine Red and Alpine White throughout the run; translucent finishes over the maple cap also occur, for example trans wine red in 1991 |
| Weight | Documented examples of this era: approx. 4.0 to 4.5 kg (8.8 to 10 lb), most around 4.1 to 4.4 kg |
| Case | Brown Gibson hardshell case with pink lining was the period-correct case |
| Dating note | Gibson's 1977-2005 eight-digit serial scheme encodes the year in digits 1 and 5 and the day of year in digits 2-4; many 1994 instruments break this and simply begin with 94 followed by a six-digit sequence |
Price history for the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
Cheapest seen: 846 EUR · Most expensive seen: 1.556 EUR
The history of the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
Gibson launched the Studio in 1983 to answer a plain commercial problem: buyers who wanted the sound and feel of a Les Paul were paying for binding, inlays and figured tops they did not need. Stripping those away and shaving the body slightly produced a Les Paul at a substantially lower price. The first years were unsettled - alder bodies were tried around 1983 to 1985 and abandoned after finishing problems, and short-lived siblings called Studio Standard (1983-1987, with binding) and Studio Custom (1983-1985, gold hardware and dot inlays) blurred the line before the concept settled.
1990 is the reset. Gibson redesigned the Studio outright: ebony fingerboard, pearloid trapezoid inlays matching the upmarket Les Pauls, and the newly introduced 490R and 498T humbuckers that replaced the pickups of the Bill Lawrence-influenced 1980s. Ebony, Wine Red and Alpine White carried the line. That specification then stayed put for seven model years, which is why 1990 to 1997 is treated as one production run - the first substantive change did not come until 1998, when rosewood replaced ebony on most finishes (Alpine White and Classic White kept ebony) and the colour palette expanded sharply.
The window is also when the Studio name began to branch. The Studio Lite (1990-1998) answered complaints about weight with a balsa core Gibson marketed as Chromyte, and the Studio Lite M-III added a middle single coil between two humbuckers. From 1996 the Gem series put P-90s under gemstone finishes with dot inlays and Grover tuners, and the SmartWood Exotic line began using certified exotic-wood tops. Behind all of it sits the aftermath of the Norlin years: the guitars of 1990 to 1997 were made by a company that had been near collapse in 1985 and was, by then, growing fast under new owners with its production consolidated in Nashville.
About Gibson as a manufacturer
Gibson goes back to Orville Gibson, who was building instruments in Kalamazoo, Michigan from 1894; the company was formally incorporated in 1902 as the Gibson Mandolin-Guitar Mfg. Co. Ltd. It passed to Chicago Musical Instruments in 1944 and then, from 1969 to 1986, to the Norlin conglomerate - the period most collectors associate with falling quality and poor decisions. Production shifted from Kalamazoo to Nashville between 1976 and 1984, and the original Michigan factory closed in 1984.
The context that matters for a 1990s Gibson is what happened next. Norlin reported losses of about 12.6 million dollars on the brand in 1985, and in January 1986 Henry Juszkiewicz, David Berryman and Gary Zebrowski - former Harvard classmates - bought the company for roughly five million dollars, reportedly with only months of runway left. The turnaround was fast and well documented: annual sales moved from under ten million dollars in 1986 to an estimated seventy million by 1993, a compound growth rate of around thirty percent a year.
That is the company that built these Studios, and it explains the era's character. The new management rebuilt the reputation of the core electrics, opened an acoustic plant in Bozeman, Montana, added a Memphis operation for semi-hollow and custom work, and in 1993 launched the Historic Collection, which is when Gibson's vintage-accurate reissue programme and the regular production line visibly diverged. Practically, that means a 1990s Gibson USA Les Paul was built to a solid, standardised production spec - short neck tenon, Nashville bridge, 49x pickups - rather than to reissue specification. Gibson's philosophy across its history has been consistent on one point: American-built, glued-neck, humbucker-driven guitars with a mahogany-led voice, sold across a price ladder from Studio to Custom Shop rather than through a single flagship.
Notable players & recordings featuring the Gibson Les Paul Studio 1990 - 1997
An honest distinction first: the guitarists who made the Les Paul famous - Jimmy Page, Slash, Joe Perry, Peter Green, Gary Moore - played Standards, Customs and 1950s bursts, not Studios. The Studio has always been the working model rather than the signature one, so its player list reads differently and is thinner by design.
From this era specifically, the clearest case is Jerry Cantrell of Alice in Chains, documented with a 1992 Les Paul Studio Lite in translucent black with the Chromyte core - the weight-relieved sibling of the guitar described here. Noel Gallagher used a Les Paul Studio at Oasis's television debut, and David Byrne played one for his 1997 Sessions At West 54th appearance. Later Studio sightings include Joey Jordison with a white example in the Murderdolls' White Wedding video, Joe Trohman of Fall Out Boy with an Alpine White one he has described as his first expensive guitar, Lenny Kravitz live at Rock in Rio Madrid in 2012, and Calvin Harris, who owned a wine red Studio before moving to Les Paul Customs.
Related guides
- Vintage vs. Reissue: Is an Old Electric Guitar Worth It? View details
- Stratocaster or Les Paul? Two Electric Guitar Classics Compared View details
- Pickup Types Explained: Single-Coil vs. Humbucker View details